AB de Villiers has always been admired for more than just his batting genius, he has been seen as someone who respects the spirit of cricket. Even after retiring, his words carry weight and he recently shared his disappointment over how politics has clouded the joy of India’s Asia Cup win.
India had beaten Pakistan in a high-voltage final, a moment that should have ended with players lifting the trophy in front of cheering fans. Instead, the team celebrated with fireworks but without the silverware in hand. Days later, they still had not received the trophy or their medals, after refusing to accept them from the Asian Cricket Council chief Mohsin Naqvi. The decision stirred plenty of debate across the cricketing world.
The atmosphere during the tournament was already tense. It came in the shadow of the Pahalgam ter*or att@cks that claimed 26 Indian lives, and every India-Pakistan clash carried extra emotion. Handshakes between the two sides were avoided and on the field, heated words and gestures only added to the friction. By the time the final ended, the trophy presentation itself had become part of the controversy.
AB de Villiers, reflecting on the situation, said that he felt politics had no place in cricket. According to him, the game should be celebrated for what it is and players should not be caught in the middle of such issues. He admitted that it was sad to see the spotlight shift away from cricket and hoped that both sides could resolve things so that the focus could return to the sport.
At the same time, he chose to highlight India’s cricketing strength. He spoke about how strong the team looks in the lead-up to the T20 World Cup, praising their depth of talent and ability to perform in big moments. For him, that was where the attention should be on the cricket itself, not the politics surrounding it.
Meanwhile, Mohsin Naqvi has stated that India is welcome to collect the trophy from the ACC headquarters in Dubai. But beyond the controversy, AB de Villiers’ message was simple, cricket should be a game that unites, not divides.
What is your take on this matter? Share your views with us.
