Cricketer Virender Sehwag is famous for his epic tweets on Twitter. He never fails to share his opinions on Twitter, be it for social issues or be it during matches.
Recently, he entertained fans with his tweet during India V/S South Africa 2nd ODI.
He had a problem with the umpire, who decided to go for lunch, although India needed only 2 runs for winning. The game could have been over, but they brought lunch in between.
This reminded Sehwag of PSU bank employees, who always ask customers to come back after lunch time. Viru Paaji didn’t hesitate to share this comparison on Twitter. This is what he tweeted;
Umpires treating Indian batsmen like PSU Bank treat customers. Lunch ke baad aana #INDvSA
— Virender Sehwag (@virendersehwag) February 4, 2018
The tweet read, “Umpires treating Indian batsmen like PSU Bank treat customers. Lunch ke baad aana #INDvSA”
This comparison didn’t go down well with some PSU bank employees. They clarified that this is not the case with all employees.
https://twitter.com/rakeshdhar/status/960361833008959488\
This one too…
I work in PSU bank. We never ask our customers to come after lunchtime.
— reshmi aneesh (@reshmikarottu) February 5, 2018
And one more…
Sir….bura maan Gaya main….I alwez..alwezzzz. saw ur matches @ Mohali….nd I'm a PSU bank officer…nd have alwez treated customers to their expectations…😂😂
— atul thakur (@atulthakur22) February 4, 2018
Sehwag quickly noticed this tweet & gave a wonderful reply to the officer. He said;
Bura na maan bhai. Tu exception hai. Most Sarkaari banks , infact most sarkaari departments don’t care for the common man. The attitude is like Maai Baap , as if they are doing a favour if they do their job. https://t.co/CRfkuSQCEb
— Virender Sehwag (@virendersehwag) February 5, 2018
The reply read, “Bura na maan bhai. Tu exception hai. Most Sarkaari banks , infact most sarkaari departments don’t care for the common man. The attitude is like Maai Baap , as if they are doing a favour if they do their job.”
Well, the former cricketer took a dig at PSU bank employees but he had to justify himself later.
Do you think this comparison was correct?