A tense exchange unfolded at The Oval ahead of the fifth and final Test between India and England, as India’s head coach Gautam Gambhir found himself in a confrontation with Lee Fortis, the head groundsman at Surrey. The dispute arose during a training session when Gambhir attempted to examine the pitch, a standard practice for coaches and captains ahead of a match to assess conditions and fine-tune strategies.
Sitanshu Kotak, India’s batting coach, explained that the situation escalated when Gautam Gambhir was abruptly told to maintain a distance of 2.5 meters from the pitch. According to Kotak, this approach was both unusual and unnecessarily strict. He noted that throughout his cricketing career, he had never encountered a groundsman asking a head coach to view the pitch from outside the boundary rope, a suggestion he found counterproductive and disrespectful.
The incident quickly stirred debate beyond the field. Former India all-rounder Irfan Pathan voiced his displeasure on social media, questioning the double standards seemingly at play. Without naming individuals, he pointed out the apparent inconsistency in treatment, observing that an English coach had been seen on the same pitch just days earlier without any objection.
Irfan Pathan tweeted, “So an English coach can walk onto the pitch to inspect it? but an Indian coach can’t? Are we still stuck in the colonial era?”
https://x.com/IrfanPathan/status/1950296145990996071
In a video on his YouTube channel, Irfan Pathan elaborated further, labeling the confrontation as a manufactured controversy intended to shift attention away from the Indian team’s performance.
Irfan Pathan clarified that Gautam Gambhir had been wearing rubber-spiked shoes, which are generally considered harmless to the pitch surface compared to metal spikes. He went on to allege that the curator in question had a reputation for confrontational behaviour, particularly with overseas teams’ staff, suggesting that Gambhir’s treatment was not an isolated case but part of a recurring pattern.
The former cricketer also lamented what he described as a long-standing bias against the Indian figures in such settings, contrasting it with the hospitality often extended to visiting teams in India. He questioned how teams are expected to prepare adequately without being allowed to physically inspect the pitch, something he deemed essential for assessing elements like hardness or moisture.
Sitanshu Kotak echoed these concerns during a press conference, stressing that while curators naturally feel protective of the pitch, that attitude should not cross into hostility or arrogance, especially when dealing with seasoned professionals. He remarked that while it’s reasonable to be cautious about potential damage, especially from inappropriate footwear or conduct, such situations should be handled with greater tact and respect.
In Sitanshu Kotak’s view, a cricket pitch, while important, is not a fragile museum artifact. He emphasised the need for a balanced approach, one that respects both the curator’s responsibilities and the needs of the visiting team’s coaching staff.
As the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy reaches its climax, this unexpected off-field episode has added a layer of controversy to an already high-stakes encounter, with lingering questions about protocol, courtesy and the unwelcome echoes of colonial-era dynamics.
