Donald Trump Said Facebook Was Always Anti-Trump. Here’s How Mark Zuckerberg Responded
Donald Trump’s allegation:
Donald Trump, the President of the USA, is very well known as a person who doesn’t mince words and he did the same when he talked about the largest social networking site Facebook as he said that Facebook “was always anti-Trump.”
Trump took to the micro-blogging site Twitter and wrote, “Facebook was always anti-Trump. The Networks were always anti-Trump hence, Fake News, @nytimes(apologized) & @WaPo were anti-Trump. Collusion?”
Facebook was always anti-Trump.The Networks were always anti-Trump hence,Fake News, @nytimes(apologized) & @WaPo were anti-Trump. Collusion?
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 27, 2017
The CEO of Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, didn’t take much time and came out in the defense of Facebook. On his Facebook page, he posted that the purpose of Facebook is to “give all people a voice and create a platform for all ideas”. However, at the same time, he accepted that now he feels that he made a mistake by dismissing that the result of elections was influenced by the fake news circulated on Facebook.
Many fingers were raised on Facebook after Donald Trump became the President of the USA, alleging that he has been helped by all the fake news that was on Facebook. At that time, Mark rejected the allegation outright but now, he feels differently on that matter.
“Calling that crazy was dismissive and I regret it. This is too important of an issue to be dismissive. But the data we have had always shown that our broader impact — from giving people a voice to enabling candidates to communicate directly to helping millions of people vote — played a far bigger role in this election.”
In today’s post, Mark also pointed out that on one side, Donald Trump is calling Facebook anti-Trump while on the other side, the liberals are of the opinion that Facebook has helped Trump.
Mark further adds,
“Both sides are upset about ideas and content they don’t like. That’s what running a platform for all ideas looks like.”
Mark also talked about the millions of interactive sessions regarding politics that took place during the US presidential elections 2016 and how the candidates used this medium to connect with their followers. Not only this, “get out the vote” campaigns were run by Facebook which influenced nearly two million people to get themselves registered for voting.
Below is Mark’s Facebook post:
“I want to respond to President Trump’s tweet this morning claiming Facebook has always been against him.
Every day I work to bring people together and build a community for everyone. We hope to give all people a voice and create a platform for all ideas.
Trump says Facebook is against him. Liberals say we helped Trump. Both sides are upset about ideas and content they don’t like. That’s what running a platform for all ideas looks like.
The facts suggest the greatest role Facebook played in the 2016 election was different from what most are saying:
– More people had a voice in this election than ever before. There were billions of interactions discussing the issues that may have never happened offline. Every topic was discussed, not just what the media covered.
– This was the first US election where the internet was a primary way candidates communicated. Every candidate had a Facebook page to communicate directly with tens of millions of followers every day.
– Campaigns spent hundreds of millions advertising online to get their messages out even further. That’s 1000x more than any problematic ads we’ve found.
– We ran “get out the vote” efforts that helped as many as 2 million people register to vote. To put that in perspective, that’s bigger than the get out the vote efforts of the Trump and Clinton campaigns put together. That’s a big deal.
After the election, I made a comment that I thought the idea misinformation on Facebook changed the outcome of the election was a crazy idea. Calling that crazy was dismissive and I regret it. This is too important an issue to be dismissive. But the data we have has always shown that our broader impact — from giving people a voice to enabling candidates to communicate directly to helping millions of people vote — played a far bigger role in this election.
We will continue to work to build a community for all people. We will do our part to defend against nation states attempting to spread misinformation and subvert elections. We’ll keep working to ensure the integrity of free and fair elections around the world, and to ensure our community is a platform for all ideas and force for good in democracy.”
What do you think regarding this matter? Let us know your views!