Connect with us

UGC Panel Recommends Removing Muslim From AMU & Hindu From BHU. Twitter Flooded With Reactions


UGC Panel Recommends Removing Muslim From AMU & Hindu From BHU. Twitter Flooded With Reactions

The Indian education system depends a lot on the central universities but most of these universities are not fulfilling the expectations of students and the nation. In an attempt to sort out the matter of high number of complaints against these universities, University Grants Commission (UGC) on the order of HRD ministry formed 5 committees on 25th April to do an audit of these universities and investigate about the complaints.

Areas of audit

The audit was related to the “academic, research, financial and infrastructure” aspects of the universities. Other than AMU, these universities were audited – Allahabad University, Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal University in Uttarakhand, Central University of Jharkhand, Central University of Rajasthan, Pondicherry University, Hari Singh Gour University in Madhya Pradesh, Central University of Jammu, Mahatma Gandhi Antarrashtriya Hindi Vishwavidyalaya in Wardha and University of Tripura.

Members of committee

The committee which audited AMU and Pondicherry University comprised of Shripad Karmalkar (IIT-Madras professor), Sankarshan Basu (a professor of IIM-Bangalore), Kailash Soda (Maharshi Dayanand Saraswati University VC) and Mazhar Asif (Guwahati University professor).

Suggested name change

The committee that audited AMU suggested that either the word “Muslim” should be removed from “Aligarh Muslim University” and it should be known as Aligarh University or it should be renamed after Sir Syed Ahmed Khan, the founder of AMU. The committee suggested the same for the “Banaras Hindu University” as well; however, BHU was not audited by them. The logic behind this suggestion is that it is a centrally-funded university so its name should be secular in nature.

Other recommendations

The committee emphasised on the need of more measures to help poor Muslims and also recommended that the procedure of appointment of VC in AMU should be the same as in other universities. Presently, AMU has more decision making power in this context.

In addition, the committee recommended that only those former students should be allowed to apply for job in the university who have passed out for or more than 5 years in order to stop “inbreeding.” Other recommendations which committee made were related to increase in fees and a probe into the matter of promotion of teachers despite the fact that there are no vacant positions available.

Twitter flooded with reactions after this recommendation. Here are few selected tweets:

Valid questions:

Can anyone answer?

Don’t make a lame issue:

This recommendation is ignoring history:

It’s an insult:

Rightly said:

It’s unnecessary:

Do you think that the panel’s suggestion of name change should be implemented?


Share Your Views In Comments Below

More in News

To Top